Were you left disappointed by your package holiday? What can you do about it?
In one of our previous articles, we touched on the subject of compensation for loss of holiday enjoyment. The Supreme Court’s 23 April 2015 ruling in Case No II Ips 160/2013 opened the door to non-pecuniary damage claims for loss of holiday enjoyment or “loss of holiday”, despite Slovenian legislation not explicitly listing such damage as a form of legally recognised damage.
- At a higher travel price, the expectations for the service/adventure quality are reasonably higher.
- Consumers also have reasonably higher expectations for one-off (e.g. wedding) trips and trips planned for an extended period.
- Minor shortcomings are not grounds for compensation, while a breach of contract lasting only a day or two does not constitute minor shortcoming for shorter trips.
Please note that in the event of a breach of a package travel contract, the consumer may, in addition to compensation, also claim a proportionate reduction in the package price. Significant deviations from the agreed scope and quality of services entitle the consumer to claim a full refund provided certain conditions under Article 57e of the Consumer Protection Act are met.