Skip to main content
Legal BuzzNews

Trade Law vs. Company Law Managing Directors Under Austrian Law: What Are the Differences?

Foreign companies establishing a branch (or subsidiary) in Austria frequently encounter a feature that is unfamiliar in many other jurisdictions: the trade law managing director (gewerberechtlicher Geschäftsführer). In Austria, this role is central to the lawful conduct of regulated business activities, yet it remains largely unfamiliar outside the country. This article explores the distinctive features of this legal construct, outlines key considerations for foreign entities, and highlights the potential risks and liability implications arising from any failure to distinguish between trade law and commercial law management.

Austrian law distinguishes between trade law managing directors appointed under the Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung) and commercial (corporate) law managing directors (handelsrechtliche Geschäftsführer), for instance, those serving in private limited liability companies (GmbH). While commercial law managing directors are responsible for overall management and its external representation, trade law managing directors ensure that business is conducted in a technically compliant manner and in accordance with trade law requirements. Furthermore, trade law managing directors serve as the designated responsible persons vis-à-vis the competent authorities. In practice, however, these roles are often conflated, which may give rise to significant legal and economic consequences.

Trade law managing directors (gewerberechtliche Geschäftsführer) constitute a distinct legal construct under Austrian law, governed by the Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung). As natural persons, they are appointed by the business owner (Gewerbeinhaber). Legal entities and registered partnerships are, in all cases, required to appoint a trade law managing director, whereas sole traders must do so in particular where they are unable to demonstrate the requisite professional competence for a regulated trade themselves or do not satisfy the applicable residence requirements.

A defining feature of this role is its public-law dimension: trade law managing directors are responsible for ensuring compliance with trade law regulations vis-à-vis the competent trade authority and may be subject to administrative penalties in the event of any breach. It is not necessary for the trade law managing director to hold a corporate office under company law. Trade law managing directors may also be ordinary employees of the company; however, it is essential that they are vested with independent authority to issue instructions in trade law matters and are actively involved in the business, enabling them to manage processes, conduct checks, and identify operational risks at an early stage. Put simply, this reflects the authorities’ intention to ensure that a person bearing professional responsibility is appointed on-site for certain activities. Typical areas of responsibility may include:

  1. scope review at market entry: assessing whether the planned services fall within the scope of the registered trade and, where necessary, initiating appropriate adjustments;
  2. service expansion: evaluating trade law permissibility of additional services;
  3. qualification and deployment control: ensuring that activities are carried out only by qualified staff or under professional supervision, particularly where staff are engaged from abroad;
  4. ongoing monitoring of trade activities, depending on the business, also through on-site presence;
  5. control and delimitation of subcontracted services: ensuring the business does not, in practice, operate beyond the scope of its trade licence.

The appointment of nominal trade law managing directors for appearances only, without genuine control or influence, is neither permissible nor valid. Such arrangements may give rise to administrative penalties and may result in the competent authority prohibiting the exercise of the trade or even revoking the trade licence.

By contrast, commercial (corporate) law managing directors (handelsrechtliche Geschäftsführer) are corporate officers under company law, responsible for managing the company’s business and representing it externally. As a general rule, they are not required to hold trade law qualifications unless they are also appointed as trade law managing directors. Conversely, trade law managing directors are, as a rule, not authorised to represent the company, even in trade law matters.

A key question for foreign businesses is: Who is liable for what, and to what extent do trade law managing directors “relieve” management of responsibility?

  • Trade law violations: trade law managing directors are typically the primary addressees under administrative criminal law (e.g., in cases of non-compliance with qualification requirements).
  • Organisational and structural responsibility: this remains with the commercial law managing directors, who may incur liability in particular where the trade law managing director is not adequately informed.
  • Internal civil liability: trade law managing directors are liable to the company where they culpably neglect their duties; commercial law managing directors are liable where they fail to establish an effective trade law compliance structure (e.g., in cases of sham appointments).
  • Criminal or administrative liability of commercial managing directors exists insofar as the matter is not assigned to the statutory scope of responsibility of an appointed trade law managing director.

An international comparison underscores the distinctive nature of this role: many legal systems do not recognise an equivalent, standardised role. Public-law responsibilities are typically vested in a company’s legal representatives, while professional responsibility is generally regulated on a sector-specific basis. Although Slovenia provides for a “responsible person” (odgovorna oseba) in certain regulated activities to ensure professional standards are met, overall regulatory responsibility generally remains with the commercial law managing director and is structured on an industry-by-industry basis.

In summary, the distinction between trade law managing directors and commercial managing directors is not merely terminological, but of significant practical importance. The appointment of a trade law managing director must not be treated as a mere formality. Real powers, meaningful operational involvement and clear responsibilities must accompany it.